Imaginos :Black & Silver
Ted O. Jackson
TOJACKSO at HAWK.SYR.EDU
Wed Feb 21 13:08:05 EST 1996
> >
>
> I always thought that CBS didn't like Imaginos and would only release
> Imaginos if it was a BOC album. And BOC was cooperating with CBS under the
> terms of their contract. So how did they shaft Albert when they ultimately
> helped get his solo album released? By grabbing credit for the album being a
> BOC album? It seems to me that one must remember that Imaginos came out
> because of BOC. No BOC, no Imaginos.
>
I think CBS would only back a new project if it was under the BOC
aegis. Then, when they heard how wild the record was, they gave up
on it as non-commercial. MHO! But--No Al, no 'Imaginos' either.
It certainly was his project. Even if he needed the BOC name to make
the album, it's unfair for the band to try to consider it theirs.
> It seems to me that alot of the blame for all of this belongs with CBS. Had
> they done what they should have, Imaginos would have been a VERY different
> creature. I've heard Albert's version of Imaginos (at the Museum) and it is
> significantly different in both feel and texture. It the original version
> better? Hard to say. I've listened to the BOC Imaginos a zillion times,
> Alberts version once. It's different. Better? In some ways, sure. In
> others, no. Would Alberts version have been more successful and allowed for
> Imaginos 2? Who knows? I, for one, would LOVE to hear Imaginos 2 (and 3!!).
>
>
> Makes for great speculation...
>
> R.
Right on there. CBS cowardice blew it. If they had backed the
project properly--maybe even pressured the band to re-group with a
promise of heavy backing and front money. Maybe things would have
turned out better. Tough call...
theo
More information about the boc-l
mailing list