Imaginos :Black & Silver
Rocker22 at AOL.COM
Rocker22 at AOL.COM
Fri Feb 23 14:19:25 EST 1996
In a message dated 96-02-23 10:37:37 EST, Al writes:
>>However, TO ME, Alberts version is significantly
>>different in both feel and texture. Not good different, not bad different,
>>just...different.
>
>I don't know what version you have heard. I could understand a difference
>in texture, every mix is different, but feel? As in rhythmic feel? There is
>not one iota of difference in the rhythm tracks of Imaginos between their
>version and mine and if you don't believe me ask EB or DR.
>Al
Well, it's been awhile since I heard Alberts version (6 months), but as I
recall, I walked away with a new perspective on Imaginos. My "feel" comment
relates to the revised vocals and additional overdubs (maybe "feel" isn't the
proper term...). The "missing" BOC revisions imparted a different
perspective to Alberts Imaginos.
Rhythmically, the two versions seemed the same.
I liked Alberts vocals on his version. Alberts comments on the budget and
marketing makes everything even more interesting.
In light of CBS's comments and actions, this makes me wonder if CBS had
(has?) ANY brains whatsoever.
My vote is that they don't...
R.
More information about the boc-l
mailing list