HW: DH vs. ...
Chris Bates
C.D.Bates at SHU.AC.UK
Thu Nov 20 04:52:43 EST 1997
Carl wrote:
> On ons 19 nov 1997 12.26 -0500 "Alun Hughes" <a.hughes at NEWI.AC.UK> wrote:
> > It's a good job this got released *after* _Distant Horizons_ and not
> > before, because _DH_ mightn't have got much of a look in. Not that it's
> > bad (except for Waimea Canyon Drive) but to us old-timers it's not the
> > same, is it? Mind you, I do like "Batman"^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H"Phetamine
> > Street" ...
>
> DH ain't bad, but I don't think its high points reach the high points
> of ET. Heck, I think Sputnik Stan and Alien I Am are probably better than
> anything on DH.
I have to disagree with both Alun and Carl here. For my money
DH is the best HW studio album since the RCA years. Usually when
I listen to a new HW album I end up thinking that it's good but
not great. Well DH really excites me, I think it is great - at
least as good as CYM or SA but slightly worse than the awesome
Levitation.
For what my opinion is worth, there you have it
Chris Bates
More information about the boc-l
mailing list