Rush vs. B+C

[Joseph Brooks]

Heh.. That would be interesting. But I still wouldn't pay any attention. I
like hearing others opinions as much as I like making my own know to anyone
willing to listen but they can rarely cause me to unlike something I've
already grown to like. I honestly don't understand why their opinion should
be any more valid than yours or Theo's or even my own. Sure, some critics
may have an insider view that I lack.. their reactions to art are still
highly subjective. If one has a known expertise in music, I may listen if
it's the actual musical skill that's being critiqued... beyond that its all
opinion.

JB

                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Andrew A. Apold [mailto:mordru at FLITE.NET]
                Sent:   Friday, March 12, 1999 2:18 PM
                To:     Multiple recipients of list BOC-L
                Subject:        Re: Rush vs. B+C

                >And what is a credible critic? One that you happen to agree
with? I hate
                >critics.. We're all critics. Any time you post your
opinions about music in
                >a public place you are as credible of a critic as any
asshole that gets paid
                >for it. Oooohh, I hate professional critics even more than
I hate Boston and
                >lawyers... Who gives a damn what they think? I either like
something or I
                >don't and I don't need some dweeb to point the way.

                Hmmmm.  I wonder if rock critics such as Meltzer or Deb ever
reviewed
                anything by Rush.....

                ============================================
                "I was corrupt before I had power!" - Random

                Andrew Apold