Coupla topics
J Strobridge
eset08 at HOLYROOD.ED.AC.UK
Tue May 11 10:33:14 EDT 1999
M Holmes writes:
> Gekke Henkie writes:
>
> > > The other great film-to-be of Space Opera is of course Asimov's
> > > "Foundation" series, so long as they don't make as bad a fist of it as
> > > they did with "Nightfall".
>
> > Foundation as a space opera in 7, 8 no 9 parts...or did I miss
> > some...don't know
>
> Well I'd stick to the Straight Hari Seldon stuff and keep the Robots out
> of it. It irritated me that suddenly every Asimov book had to be tied
> to the Robots. If he hadn't died they'd have started appearing in his texts
> on biochemistry.
You know that Benford has written a prequel to this (and Greg Bear has
done one too I think) leading up to the collapse of Trantor - and, yes,
the robots feature prominently! I don't think you can write them out.
>
> Come to think of it I'd probably skip the stuff with The Mule too...
Apparently just before Asimov died he re-read his Foundation trilogy and
expressed absolute amazement that "nothing happened" in them. This is
true - they are gorgeous (and I use this word in its 'richly coloured'
'amazing' sense) environments but contain very few events. I don't
think the Foundation books themselves would make a good film but
they'd be a good background for somebody's heroic adventures perhaps - a
sort of butterfly-wing-flapping situation within the whole context of
psychohistory - but then I'm not at all sure how you could realistically
put the psychohistory concept over in a film either!
jill
Vague on-topic reference: I wonder if Ron Tree ever managed to sell his
robot. Perhaps he could offer it as a prize at the SF convention.
==========================================================================
J.D.Strobridge at ed.ac.uk eset08 at holyrood.ed.ac.uk
ELIJSA at srv0.arts.ed.ac.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the boc-l
mailing list