Andrew G's Comments on Off: etc

[michael blackman]

Here here ... there there .... poo poo
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Warburton <desdinova at BREATHEMAIL.NET>
To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: Andrew G's Comments on Off: etc


> ORDER...ORRRDERRR!!!!!
> >hear hear!!
> >
> >Honestly - you're all behaving like mebers of Parliament!!!
> >
> > >This is all giving mwe some insight as to how Brock must feel with
> > >his merry
> > >band of men.
> > >In an effort to get back to reality, I note that the comment on the
Brock Q
> > >& A session has been lacking - no reactions anyone? For my part, it
would
> > >appear that Dave Brock is not stuck in the '70's, like some
> > >people, and that
> > >he still has a vision of Hawkwind progressing into the future, albeit
> > >perhaps not what many of you out thwere particulalry want but for which
he
> > >hopes you will give him the time of day.
> > >Clearly he sees villains in the stage along the way, but as people fall
out
> > >slightly, others fall back in and when push comes to shove he clearly
> > >believes that he is holding the reins on the good ship Hawkwind.
> > >I say three cheers for Dave who, when faced with some of the things
that
> > >seem to go on in Camp Hawkwind, it's a wonder that he hasn't given up
and
> > >taken his bags with him.
> > >So, we have a whole slew of new music to lok forward to, tours with
various
> > >people, maybe even the start of Brock solo outings (or some form). No,
> > >Hawkwind aren't Gong, and Brock isn't Daevid Allen, but Allen has his
> > >fingers in many musical pies, some of which I love, some of which I
hate,
> > >but at least he's still out there and after many bumpy rides, Gong are
> > >stronger now than at any time since the '70's.
> > >.......and for thsoe who say that the Hawks left good albums behind in
the
> > >'70's, has anyone seriously listened to all of 'Xenon Codex' lately? Go
> > >ahead - revisit that tonight and tell me if it isn't one gem of a real
> > >Hawkwind album.
> > >Enough - supper's ready........
> > >Andy Garibaldi
> > >
> > >
> > >> My apologies for this stoopit waste of time. "<>"
> > >> =====
> > >> In a message dated 6/19/00 7:08:20 AM, dmckeehen at HOTMAIL.COM writes:
> > >>
> > >> <<
> > >> As I understand, several others have done the same thing, regarding
the
> > >same
> > >> person.>>
> > >>  ======
> > >> and golly gee, this one is wondering who that 'same person' might be.
> > >> probably the same miscreant characterized as an 'idiot' by mr.
mckeehen
> > >> yesterday.
> > >> but mr. mckeehen  likes to play 'allusions' like this.
> > >> this is hardly the first, or second, time.
> > >>
> > >> i thought i was having an amusing volley w/the 'lemmy shmemmy' lady
and
> > >> another fellow on saturday morning [they both corresponded w/me
off-group
> > >> too, that day].
> > >> however, mr. mckeehen had a problem w/this and felt he had to go
on-group
> > >and
> > >> _allude_  that i was the  'idiot' in question.
> > >>
> > >> mr. mckeehen is hung up on his interpretation of 'protocol'.
> > >>
> > >> anyone else w/a problem w/me, in general or specifically saturday,
> > >> please clobber me off-group.
> > >>
> > >> however, mr. mckeehen _cant_ do that, because i blocked _his_
off-group
> > >mail
> > >> months ago.
> > >>
> > >> and i repeat my apology for this waste of time.
> > >> but i'm _tired_ of the 'allusions' of the _stoneless_ mr. mckeehen.
> > >>
> > >> "<>"
> > >> larry boyd
>