OFF:<<== see? WARNING! the word NAPSTER appears in this post!-_-

[Michaelangelo Blackman]

If your a Hawkwind fan then you must be allright

allright..............

from MICHAELANGELO at kangaroo land
----- Original Message -----
From: <DASLUD at AOL.COM>
To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2000 10:00 PM
Subject: Re: OFF:<<== see? WARNING! the word NAPSTER appears in this
post!-_-


> In a message dated 5/13/00 7:10:13 AM, beautiful_foot at HOTMAIL.COM writes:
>
> << So if you search for your own band and find no matches.....nobody has
your
> MP3 files.  Simple as that.  Don't be shooting the messenger or anything.
>  =====
> not _quite_ so simple, perhaps....
>
> as i recall, as remaining brain cells allow, someone sent me the napster
link
> some time back; i responded to said link w/ one das ludicroix track.
>
> now, my pal kermit, the guy who made all the mp3's pour moi, made his
_entire
> collexion_ available to napster, which included the first UK cassette by
das
> ludicroix, "jammed and stoning", and a couple 'dummy' disarray cd's which
a
> friend put together pour moi.
>
> if napster requires the supplying folx to be online when downloads happen,
> heh, kermit, along w/my dear friend heidi, went to maine until summer's
> end....and he doesnt appear to be online.
> =
> _why_ don't i know how napster conducts their transactions?
> because i couldnt care less.
>
> mp3's are a waste of space, IMO, and the only ones i possess happen to be
> selections i  played on. and kermit, being incommunicado, has _far_ more
than
> moi.
> i have two das ludicroix trax, two dsra trax, and the scylding material i
> recorded w/carl anderson in '95.
>
> my main concern regarding napster [in my post from yesterday,] involved
the
> potentially-sinister implications of the phrase "hunted down and
> blocked".....to the tune of over 317, 000 computers.
>
> ==>>and _none_ of y'all are troubled by this?
>
> blah blah etc
> larry b
> dsra
> das ludicroix
> "<>"
> ==
> ps> considering the recent devastation by fire of los alamos, NM, 'twould
> seem we of BOC-L showed admirable restraint in not referring to a certain
> song by BOC.
> and you _know_ which one i mean.
> ===
> <<Sitting on two chairs in the company of knowledgable reasonable persons
is
> more or less possible, - doing same in the company of ravers results in a
> fall, and taking of sides...>>
> KISAKO 2K
>