In article <3ljCntA7Sai6Ewl$@hermit0.demon.co.uk>, Nick Medford <nick at HERMIT0.DEMON.CO.UK> writes >> >>No cyclopses, eh? >> > >Now what IS the plural of cyclops? Can it be plural? Oh C'mon! Clearly, cyclops is a plural already. The singular is cyclop. Jeez. -- Jon