BOC : Re: CotHM
Ted Jackson
tojackso at LIBRARY.SYR.EDU
Thu Jun 28 07:38:33 EDT 2001
On 27 Jun 2001, at 16:24, John A. Swartz wrote:
But my point
> is really in that I think the negativity expressed is against some
> mythical standard of what BOC "ought" to be - which is why the term
> "Secret Treaties II" gets used. People seem to have a hard time
> taking the current band at face value, and enjoying it for what it is
> - rather than holding it up against it's greatest work and being
> disappointed when it doesn't measure up.
>
Which is unfair to the band, esp. its new members. Anyone
besides me impressed by the work that DM and BR have
contributed to CotHM? Those 2 guys are monster players...
theo
More information about the boc-l
mailing list