HW: Weirdos in general

[J D]

Hi,
Well, if your main criteria is to avoid duplication wherever possible then
your priority should be:

5,7,4,3,2,1,6 (top priority first).

This is only a rough order, I've not compared minutes of duplication.
Besides it depends on what you already own (surprisingly enough).

Jez


----- Original Message -----
From: Chuck Rosenberg <Chuckrecs at AOL.COM>
To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 2:55 AM
Subject: Re: HW: Weirdos in general


> In a message dated 3/23/01 2:16:11 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> Jeremy at DACOMBE.FSNET.CO.UK writes:
>
> > As someone correctly pointed out, the Weirdo tapes were the originals of
> >  much of the stuff that has since appeared of numerous compilations, so
it's
> >  a bit unfair to level that critisism at them.
>
> well, it _is_, since as someone said, the die-hards have about %90 of it
> already. Then again, some one else pointed out that at least Brock/HW are
> supposed to get royalties this time, which means that Kollecticism aside,
> maybe we should all go sell all our "repeat" discs and buy these...
>
> >  It's just unfortunate that these took so long to see the light of day
on
> CD.
> >  Admittedly there's half a dozen songs that you just don't want to buy
again
> >  (Douglas, Over The Top, Valium, Sundown, Do It etc (due to repetition
(not
> >  quality))), but these are far outweighed by the other material.
> >  I'm no completest, but these are all musts.
>
> Really?? I bought #1 and only about %25 percent was previously heard (not
> that I have everything) and I thought that was a pretty _high_ percentage
> compared to a couple other listings i've seen.
> Chuck
>