Nik Q&A

[ANDREW GARIBALDI]

with this I agree- when you look at the Turner CD release roster, it is
uniformly excellent bar the '2001' thing and it just amazes me how on earth
anyone, musician or label, could have sanctioend the release of such a
thing, but it is, I hope, a one-off and that everyone has learnt a lesson -
you can't have pristine quality with all releases, for archive and live
albums have their place, but there are limits beyond which those who know,
should not stray. I loved 'Complete Live '79' but hated 'Glastonbury'
quality-wise, and the same with 'Deeply Vale' over the '2001' CD for the
Turner camp.
But Turner has turned in a set of great CD's of that there is no doubt, but
then so have most of the Hawkwind camp - I guess accidents happen, but they
could be avoided.
Andy G.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Witt" <Lwitt1 at QWEST.NET>
To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: Nik Q&A


> > sorry, TR, you sanctioned the release of a sh**  album, badly played &
> > recorded. (2001 Oddysey).
> > That this album exists,  is not BS or hearsay, and follows a long
> tradition
> > of you and DA releasing b***ocks albums, disguised