HW: Early Days & Studio Dates

[dave hall]

Not nice, perhaps. But true. This x-Hawkwind stuff may be a nice nostalgia
trip for the guys in the band. Fine. But to dress it up as somehow
maintaining "the spirit of Hawkwind" is dross, especially when they try to
flog a lot of extremely dodgy live material of rehashed HW tunes. It's a bit
like Pete Best reforming the Beatles.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: stephen lindas <lindas1 at ADELPHIA.NET>
To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU <BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>
Date: 27 March 2002 22:11
Subject: Re: HW: Early Days & Studio Dates


>Well thats not very nice. I thought they invited Dave and he didn't want to
>come. You can't change history. STEPHE
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "dave hall" <dave at PARMA29.FREESERVE.CO.UK>
>To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:41 PM
>Subject: Re: HW: Early Days & Studio Dates
>
>
>> More from the x-Hawkwind historical revisionist camp. What next,
>airbrushing
>> Dave out of early band shots?
>>
>> Dave
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rik Rx <hw at CY-B.ORG>
>> To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU <BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>
>> Date: 26 March 2002 20:57
>> Subject: Re: HW: Early Days & Studio Dates
>>
>>
>> >But does anyone else find it totally hilarious that Mick Slatterys
>> >version misses out Dave's input completely? hahahahhaha....
>> >I laughed and laughed...  brilliant.
>> >
>> >Rx
>> >
>> ><<SNIP>>
>> >>Here's Doug Smith's take on the All Saints Hall and its
>> >>aftermath:
>> >>        http://www.ibiblio.org/mal/MO/philm/friends/douglas.html
>> >>As Dave Bottomley said of Mick Slattery's version, "the basic
>> >>story is familiar, but it's the detail that makes it."
>> >>
>> >>--
>> >>
>> >>|  | /\
>> >>|-_|/  >   Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont.        erics at telepres.com
>> >>|  |  /
>> >>"Outlook not so good."  That magic 8-ball knows everything!
>> >>I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
>> >>        - Anonymous
>> >
>