OFF:An Open Letter to Rolling Stone by Joan Jett
Bolts of Ungodly Vision
js3619 at ACMENET.NET
Sun Nov 24 14:29:21 EST 2002
>> An Open Letter to Rolling Stone
>> by Joan Jett
>>
>> This letter was written to rolling stone after their
>> "women in "rock" issue was published, but was not
>> printed by their editors. Please forward it to all the
>> rocking people you know!!!!!
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>>
>> I tried to find some cleverly worded way to express my
>> disgust with your "Women in Rock" issue, but what i
>> have to say is really quite simple: You guys are
>> completely retarded.
>>
>> By RS standards, Rock is no longer a style of music but
>> a trendy costume to be whipped up by expensive stylists
>> and slapped onto the latest pop tart barbie doll. Give
>> a girl some tight pants and a spiky bracelet and POOF!
>> She ROCKS!
>>
>> Your poor choice of cover girls and featured artists
>> brings to mind the Sports Illustrated swimsuit
>> editions. There is nothing necessarily wrong with the
>> breast-baring models inside..but we all understand that
>> they have NOTHING TO DO WITH SPORTS--Which just might be
>> offensive to women who are interested in sports or who
>> might even be (gasp) real athletes.
>>
>> Yes, Britney has a talented stylist and yes, somebody
>> gave Shakira a Guns & Roses t-shirt to wear..but they
>> ARE NOT NOW NOR WILL THEY EVER BE ROCK.
>>
>> Maybe it's naive of me to expect any glimmer of
>> rock'n'roll credibility OR respect for women from a
>> magazine whose cover shot is regularly a naked
>> underweight actress. The thing is, I AM a woman
>> musician with a rock band, and as we all are I am
>> STARVED for any little crumb of recognition that real
>> women rockers might be thrown. So like a sucker I find
>> myself short another five bucks ..and pissed enough to
>> write my first letter to an editor. Avril Lavigne gets
>> some studded accessories from Hot Topic so now she's
>> "upholding the brazen tradition of teenage
>> outrage"???!! Are you SERIOUS? And could someone please
>> explain to me why people keep insisting on referring to
>> PINK as rock? Wasn't she doing the white girl hip hop
>> thing a minute ago? Yeah, she performed on the
>> Aerosmith tribute show --big deal..she was on the Janet
>> Jackson tribute show just before that--Whatever's
>> trendy. WHO CARES. She's a Spice Girl reject...but I
>> digress.
>>
>> Jewel and Mandy friggin' Moore have full page features
>> as Rock Icons...Meanwhile Joan Jett gets one line. ONE
>> LINE. Joan Jett & the Blackhearts, who have never
>> stopped touring, recently did 10 days in the Middle
>> East playing for the troops stationed in Afghanistan.
>> In AFGHANISTAN, Joan would come onstage wearing a
>> birkha, which she ripped off and stomped on before
>> blazing through the purest and nastiest rock show
>> ANYWHERE. But even in the RS WOMEN IN ROCK issue, a
>> story like that gets ONE SENTENCE on the bottom of the
>> last page of Random Notes.
>>
>> Britney's Rock credentials? Well, she butchers the song
>> "I Love Rock'n'Roll" on her latest record, and when
>> asked about it the genius replies "Well, I've always
>> loved Pat Benatar." And SHE is your Rock issue cover
>> girl?? You should be REALLY embarrassed.
>>
>> Sleater Kinney was the only rock group listed on the
>> cover..and they got only half a page. Ashanti, the r&b
>> back up singer who can't seem to do anything without
>> "featuring Jah Rule," has two pages.
>>
>> What about the Donnas? The Yeah Yeah Yeahs? The
>> Distillers? A mag like RS has the power to shine
>> important light on groups like these-- instead they are
>> afterthoughts, and that valuable spotlight is wasted on
>> the same overexposed pop princesses WHO HAVE NOTHING TO
>> DO WITH ROCK.
>>
>> In your own letter from the editor you have the
>> hypocritical balls to say "rock radio won't touch
>> female artists, while the pop factory keeps churning
>> out soundalike clones, and ambitious musicians with
>> something to say find themselves left out in the cold."
>>
>> The pages that follow those words are a blatant display
>> that Rolling Stone magazine is happily working for the
>> factory now too.
>>
>> If the issue had been called "Women in Music"..or maybe
>> "Some Cute Girls with Top 10 Records out Right Now"..I
>> would have no beef with it. Corny as it may sound, ROCK
>> is something which is still meaningful and even sacred
>> to some of us. Use the word "rock" in bold letters next
>> to a picture of Britney Fucking Spears, and you're
>> turning your whole publication into a joke...and an
>> offensive joke at that.
More information about the boc-l
mailing list