Live in Nottingham
Andrew Garibaldi
Deadearnest at BTOPENWORLD.COM
Sat Jun 21 16:30:36 EDT 2003
I wouldimagine that this is down to the labels. CRL had access to the
original source master while I would also imagine that the VP one was taken
from an analogue master.
The other fly in the ointment comes from the fact that CRL is eligible
(allegedly) to release their material without requiring any permission from
the band members, while VP are (supposedly) working directly with the band.
In the past VP have released things from "private" collections as well as
those provided by the bands, while the source material for CRL is down a
chain of TV owners, in case of some other than Hawkwind,going back to the
days of Central TV back in 1971.
So, really, the only way this question is going to be answered correctly
here, is by Dave or Voiceprint, I would imagine.
Hope I've been of help in some way,
Andy G.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernhard Pospiech" <bernhard.pospiech at T-ONLINE.DE>
To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET>
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:14 PM
Subject: HW: Live in Nottingham
> Hi folks
> (Hello Colin)
>
>
> Bought today an official CD called LIVE IN NOTTINGHAM.
> It is a single CD, not the double one which contains a 2nd gig (with
> unknown date / venue)
>
>
> On this single CD is the Nottingham gig from 25.01.1990.
> Unfortunately again without WIND OF CHANGE
>
> My question is:
> Why is the 25.01.90 gig on the double CD recorded in MONO and on the
single
> CD recorded in STEREO (superb quality)
>
> I think this is a big shame!
>
>
> cheers
> Bernhard
More information about the boc-l
mailing list