The Wrong Number of The Beast

[MikeMontfort]

Ah beat me to it Ian

Ian Abrahams wrote:

>What about 667 - is that still the neighbour of the beast?
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "M Holmes" <fofp at HOLYROOD.ED.AC.UK>
>To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET>
>Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 3:49 PM
>Subject: The Wrong Number of The Beast
>
>
>
>
>>Looks like Heavy Metal got it wrong:
>>
>>http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/story.jsp?story=634679
>>
>>Executive Summary: 616 is the Number of The Beast. Previous Numbers of
>>The Beast should be disregarded as invalid, if not heresy.
>>
>>FoFP
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

--
No trees were harmed in the production of this e-mail; however, a huge number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.

Floyd Code
v1.2a r BO* 1/0/@ tG 0- 0 UG 5 51 65.5% <29mar5>
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GB/L/MU d+(++) s: a+ C++(+++)$ !UC--- P+>$ L E? W+++$ N(++) o K- w+$>++ !O !M- V PS+(++) PE Y+ PGP- t+ 5++ X- R tv+ b+++(++++) DI++ D+ G e++(++++) h---- r+++ z++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------