OFF: Success!!!

Bart Brugmans bart at HAWKBOY.NL
Fri Nov 17 11:04:30 EST 2006


Needlegun anyone?

--BArt

On Fri, November 17, 2006 3:57 pm, Colin Allen wrote:
> Sod that! Why not just carry a Queen Elizabeth class dreadnought around;).
>  That would scare the buggers.
>
> trev <judge48 at HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:   i agree about handguns, but i feel
> strongly that an exception should be made
> not just for heavy artillery, but for anything above and including the
> good
> old 88mm. just imagine, our budding wyat earp pulls his six-gun (probably
> pissed) while 1000 yards away...JA WOHL. ...the steely blue eyes of
> uberstrumbahnfuhrer schmidt cross the hairs on the superb krupps-made
> piece
> and FEUER!...the high velocity 88mm solid shot round takes the buntline
> special out of the pratts hand.
> woooo lordy, who stole ma piece?
> see what i mean, no injury and good promo for the 3rd reich...cough
>
> by the way whos coming to our gig slough tomorrow
>
> AND THERE CAME THE BEASTS AND KINGS WITH THEIR ARMIES AND THEIR CAPTAINS
> TO
> MAKE WAR WITH HIM UPON THE HORSE AND TO MAKE WAR WITH HIS ARMIES AND HIS
> EYES WERE AS A FLAME OF FIRE HE WAS CROWNED WITH MANY CROWNS AND IN
> RIGHTEOUSNESS HE JUDGES AND IN RIGHTEOUSNESS HE WAGES WAR
> http://www.judgetrev.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Hutchby"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 1:05 PM
> Subject: Re: OFF: Success!!!
>
>
>> An absolutely outrageous idea that ordinary people should be allowed to
>> carry guns of any description. Look at the comparison between gun
>> related
>> deaths i
>> n the UK and the US, popuation difference aside the per capita %age
>> speaks
>> for itself. Also look at the statistics of how many of them are shot
>> with
>> their
>> own weapon (that includes cops).
>> Just think of the amount of idiots that get a driving licence - you want
>> to
>> trust them to make split second decisions to use a firearm correctly and
>> in
>> accordance with prevailing legislation ?????
>> And out of interest, what sort of "training qualification" would be
>> appropriate......I don't think there are many judgemental simulators in
>> the public
>> domain which would allow for scenario training; let alone people
>> qualified to
>> impart the rationale behind the whole judgemental process of whether to
>> shoot
>> or not.
>> I know this isn't the forum for this debate but I cannot believe this is
>> even a serious consideration.
>>
>



More information about the boc-l mailing list