Posting guidlines as per the group

[Mike Montfort]

No harm no foul. I'm very appreciative that in a re-reading everyone 
understood I meant no Censorship.

Like many here I worried when Mike C was missing and was so glad to have 
him back. It was not about him. or Mary. or anyone else specifically.  
Just a general request. 

I'm not about Censorship at all. 

Peace to all.

Mike
http://corwyn.blogspot.com
the blog
http://www.mikemontfort.com
the pics
http://www.myspace.com/mikemontfort
the myspace
http://s105.photobucket.com/albums/m220/MikeMontfort/
the photobucket
http://www.flickr.com/photos/corwyn/
the flickr site



trev wrote:
> hi mike montfort,
>
> i made a mistake - i thought you were a moderator because your mail 
> sounded like a moderator mail. we all know how mistakes like this are 
> so easily made on internet conversations. it makes the "hi jack" part 
> of my mail nonsense, so for that, i apologise.
> if you were a moderator, with the power that goes with being a 
> moderator, my post would still stand.
> we like to look after our Blessed Ones you see
>
> best wishes,
>
> Judge Trev
>
> tel: 0044 (0)1273 387645
> REAL FESTIVAL MUSIC - RFM   http://www.realfestivalmusic.co.uk
> Festival Listings, Festival Reviews, CDs, Video Downloads, News, Healers
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean Lansford" 
> <oystrgal at BELLSOUTH.NET>
> To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET>
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 12:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Posting guidlines as per the group
>
>
>> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, trev <judge48 at HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:
>>
>>> hallo mike montfort,
>>>
>>> people like me, nik turner, dave brock, and  scores (if not 
>>> hundreds) of
>>> musicicians have given their  their sweat, and their blood and their 
>>> souls,
>>> and some literally their very lives to create the music and to 
>>> spread the
>>> ethics of light and tolerance which the spacerock genre and Hawkwind
>>> represent.
>>>
>>> it troubles me when i find what seems to be intolerance  from 
>>> someone who
>>> has hi jacked our names and our lifes works for his own benefit i.e. 
>>> you and
>>> this list - and then turns and decides to tell us how to speak and to
>>> communicate.
>>>
>>> I don't see flaming here. I don't see any unpleasantness at all - i 
>>> don't
>>> see much deviation from hawkfamily ethics and standard practise, and 
>>> i dont
>>> see any "off" except now from you.
>>
>> What a load of BS.
>>
>> It's not about flaming. Or censorship. Or any other wild-ass
>> accusation.
>>
>> It's about good manners.
>>
>> What you're doing here is the equivalent of talking loudly on
>> your cel phone during a movie. Would you get equally upset if the
>> theater usher asked you to take your phone conversation out to
>> the lobby?
>>
>> Asking that you mark your messages as not directly related to
>> news of any of the various bands isn't asking you to shut up. The
>> way things are now, if I don't care about your "hawkfamily"
>> chatter, I'll have to individually ignore each of you to cut down
>> on the amount of email I have to sift through each day. So this:
>>
>>> Mike Coleman is one of the most knowledgable hawk record collectors
>>> anywhere, let alone on this list.
>>
>> is of no consequence, because I'll never see it after saying
>> "Hmm, he's one of the ones posting a lot of the stuff I won't
>> ever want to read." and sending anything from his email address
>> to /dev/null. If he doesn't mark his messages as
>> collector-related vs miscellaneous community sorts of things, I
>> have no other way to filter the community ramblings (his AND
>> yours) out.
>>
>> You're being rude, son. Try again.
>> -- 
>> Jean Lansford
>> oystrgal at bellsouth.net
>>
>> Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to
>> write for the public and have no self.
>> - Cyril Connolly
>>
>