CD-R quality (was Re: Shameless CDR vs CD questions)
Stephen Swann
swann at PLUTONIA.COM
Sun Mar 2 09:51:42 EST 2008
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:51:41PM +0000, Paul Mather wrote:
>
> The data CD gets less data per sector because they use some of the raw
> sector data for extra data integrity checking: it's more important
> that you detect that the balance in your bank spreadsheet file has
> erroneously changed than some audio samples in a frame. The former
> would be potentially catastrophic, whereas the latter would probably
> be perceptually unnoticeable.
... except of course that audio CD error is often a lot worse if
the physical disc is even slightly marred, and if I ever had a
chance to time travel and chat with the people who made that
decision about Audio CDs, I'd want to have a pair of iron tongs
and a blowtorch with me.
> (BTW, the main reason expensive CD players sound better than cheap
> ones is due mostly to the better quality of the analogue components.)
I'd agree with that ever since advanced error correction
technology got cheap - what *used* to be the biggest difference
was how well they coped with imperfect CDs...
> It's not true that you can't make a bit-identical copy of an audio
> CD.
[...]
> So, to make bit-identical copies, you need: a) decent CDDA extraction
> software aware of the issues (e.g., EAC; cdparanoia; etc.), and b) to
> calibrate your CD drive. There are lots of tutorials on how to do
> this, via a variety of mechanisms, on the Web. (E.g., do a search for
> "EAC sample offset".) Some extractors, like EAC and dBPowerAMP
> support AccurateRip, which lets you calibrate your drive with respect
> to a database of known pressed CDs and even compare your rips with
> others.
I'd just like to note that I went to MIT and I found it difficult
to get my head around all the ins and out of digital audio
extraction - finally concluding that the effort-to-results sweet
spot was somewhere around 99.8% certainty. So be warned, it's
not *quite* as simple to do this as Dr. Mather (an expert on the
subject) makes it sound... No offense Paul - I know you give us
all more credit than we deserve. ;-)
Steve
More information about the boc-l
mailing list