HW 40th Anniversay Show
Paul Mather
paul at GROMIT.DLIB.VT.EDU
Wed Feb 25 09:12:48 EST 2009
On 25 Feb 2009, at 7:35 AM, M Holmes wrote:
> I'm sure Alan feels he has his professional grievances. I'm sorry to
> see that he doesn't view it as below his dignity to air them in a
> magazine. His comment that he knows better than Dave what the fans
> want
> to hear perhaps have some pertinence to us, but in the end Dave is the
> boss and we all know we have to do shit the boss tells us even when
> we're certain we're in the right. The rest of the comment just looks
> like spite, particularly, as someone else pointed out, the
> circumstances
> in which Alan came to the band.
>
> Right now he sounds worryingly like Turner did many years ago: someone
> who's out of the band in fact, but mentally just can't seem to get to
> grips with that.
Maybe I am in an minority, but I actually found Alan's interview to be
rather informative and refreshing. I certainly learned a lot! I
didn't see it so much as you say above, but more along the lines of
"now I'm out, I feel free to tell my side of the story instead of
having to toe the party line." As with all he said/she said
arguments, the real truth lies somewhere between, but I, for one, am
at least glad to have both sides stated of various puzzling episodes
of Hawkwind history, such as why Alan left the band on various
occasions. (It's nice to hear that at least it wasn't all about
money, which is the usual tune we hear sung.)
Maybe it is more "dignified" not to tell your side of the story, but
it is probably hard to keep quiet when you believe that outright lies
are being told about you. Is it better for these things to leak out
through murky third-party channels? I can appreciate that Alan might
not want to let stand unchallenged statements like the taping/trading
ban was all down to him, or that he had blown off Hawkfest and "gone
fishing" instead. Leaving that unchallenged, if it is true, can
damage your professional reputation.
One thing that reassured me about the interview is that I discovered I
am not the only one appalled by the modern method of Hawkwind
recording. I was absolutely horrified when I read in one of the
Hawkwind book bios that everything is methodically sequenced, even the
drums---the drums, for God's sake! It just ain't right, I tells ya! :-)
I agree with you that the stench of sour grapes hangs heavy over that
interview. But, I, for one, am glad that Alan told his side of
things. How true it is, I will probably never know. But, it does add
to the general body of evidence that states that Hawkwind is very
dysfunctional. I don't know if trying to whitewash that fact away
will help matters any. Perhaps being aware of how screwed up and
badly organised the band is will make us appreciate all the more what
time we have with them together with Brock at the helm putting out new
material, for surely a ship as leaky as this can't sail on too much
longer...
Cheers,
Paul.
e-mail: paul at gromit.dlib.vt.edu
"Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production
deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid."
--- Frank Vincent Zappa
More information about the boc-l
mailing list