Krankschaft April Update

[mike c]

I just thought of something else!!
I LOVE LOVE LOVE CDs!! (and whatever better tech to come that does NOT
require a computer, I guess)
ESPECIALLY ESPECIALLY for the perfect playback, the ability to hold
more material than LPs, and most of all "shuffle/random" play!!
The problem is they have pushed vinyl OUT, as of years ago, which I miss.
If there are going to be loads of, say,  Hawkwind rehash, let it be
WAX so I get a cool pictures like I used to.
I want my paper product YOU BASTARDS.
I want to pay $3 for CDs
THAT is the problem for me.....
Also, I am aware that nobody here was ever talking to me, and that I
am talking to myself basically, and I am OK with that at this moment,
and I am also aware there are 2 factions that were being discussed.
KOLLEKTING and "practical listening of music"
I am not a huge fan of these heavy flashy vinyl packages either.
I'll take my NORMAL record, for a lower price
phew!!
Love Maniac


On 4/2/11, mike c <insect.brain at gmail.com> wrote:
> and my only agenda this morning was:
> "Oh god,  poor Steve, the guy who couldn't care more about going the
> extra miles and miles"
> PEACE
> I think my radiation poisoning MIGHT be fading
> I AM PRAYING
>
> On 4/2/11, mike c <insect.brain at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Jonathan outed___ :)
>> Jamun too____ :)
>> Oh what the hell, Humanity outed___ :)
>> Just kidding!!!!
>> No fluff on my needles EVER and no scratches on 99.5 percent of my
>> collection.
>> I have compared things to "fast food" versus "serving up a meal" before.
>> and then there's that pesky art that requires no squinting. and isn't
>> soiled by finger-grease if you want to let a friend have a look, by
>> chance they could see anything or brought their glasses along!!
>> But hey, I am good with CDs too, just not really attracted to them
>> anymore!!
>> SUBSCRIBE SATAN!!!
>> Nobody ACTUALLY PLAYS their Kollektions anyway (right Mike?)
>> Just stuff to show off!!!
>>
>>
>> On 4/2/11, Jonathan Smith <smithjm77x7 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Great idea! I'll always buy the CDs, but lossless files are very
>>> practical
>>> (although the right to being able to re-download them is appreciated--
>>> they
>>> do get lost sometimes). If *real HD files* (24 bit) were available, I
>>> would
>>> even prefer the files (covers for download would be good-- not that I
>>> ever
>>> really print them!).
>>>
>>> I can't understand the fashion for vinyl. Technology for real HD music
>>> has
>>> been around for years (SACD, DVD-A), and blu ray provides even better
>>> opportunities, without needing a special player, but people still want
>>> records. I know the scratches sound nice the and the fluff on the needle
>>> is
>>> fun, but why not re-introduce wax cylinders! :(
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 16:03:10 +0800, you sent through the ether:
>>>>
>>>> >Have you thought of charging a
>>>> >little extra for lossless downloads? Like flac or wav, as some of us
>>>> > can
>>>> >hear the difference?
>>>>
>>>> I was thinking for the next one of having a 3 tiered system,
>>>>
>>>> Tier 1: 128k MP3   Free
>>>> Tier 2: High Quality MP3 or Flac - Donation of your choice
>>>> Tier 3: CD with the splendid packaging £10
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully the CD packaging will sway people onto option 3 :o)
>>>>
>>>> What do you thank?
>>>>
>>>> -Steve
>>>>
>>>
>>
>