(OFF) new version of Green Finned Demon for download

[mike coleman]

can anybody confirm "invisible invaders' and "atomic submarine" as
having been a double feature?
I _seem_ to have accidentally made that connection for my friend who's
body is enjoying it's last year of middle age.
SORRY!!

On 9/20/11, mike coleman <insect.brain at gmail.com> wrote:
> never one to miss synchronicity, this book and "civilisation one" have
> had a parallel mention on the UK forum.
>
> Don't miss "Apollo 18"
> we've been being fed since day 1, just read past the (usual) BS.....
>
> If observational craft wasn't Santa, why was that term used?
> where was mrs. claus?
>
> Thank god we have Hawkwind to show the lookers
>
> 'It's getting better all the time"??  I mean, if fukushima didn't get
> us attacked,,,,,,,
>
> On 9/20/11, Jonathan Smith <smithjm77x7 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Great stuff.....
>>
>>
>>> In fact, many specialist *(sic)* suspect that the Moon is hollow, which
>>> should not be possible. If our Moon did not exist...nor would we. Higher
>>> life only developed on Earth because the Moon is exactly what it is and
>>> where it is. Whern *(sic)* all of the facts are dispassionately
>>> reviewed,
>>> it becomes unreasonable to cling to the idea that the Moon is a natural
>>> object. The only question that remains is, "Who built it"?
>>
>>
>> If its hollow, its may be full of aliens! That looks like a
>> very scientific analysis to me.
>>
>> On 21 September 2011 00:03, John Rennie <hawkfan at ratsauce.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> >Personally I have more admiration for those prepared to go the whole
>>> > hog
>>> >and say that The Moon is faked.
>>>
>>> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Who-Built-Moon-Christopher-Knight/dp/1842931326
>>>
>>> It's lunacy :-)
>>>
>>> JR
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET]
>>> On Behalf Of Mike Holmes
>>> Sent: 20 September 2011 09:55
>>> To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET
>>> Subject: Re: (OFF) new version of Green Finned Demon for download
>>>
>>> On 19/09/2011 18:09, mike coleman wrote:
>>>
>>> > I do, of course, realise, that you may have referred to bringing the
>>> > stuff back to earth.
>>>
>>> The Lunies will never permit that. What goes up, stays up.
>>>
>>> > and in a rare moment of "positivity:, it is rather nice that the moon
>>> > landing "disbelievers" will have to work harder now
>>>
>>> If someone thinks the Apollo programme was faked, it should be
>>> relatively easy for them to believe that these so-called lunar
>>> satellites are faked too.
>>>
>>> Personally I have more admiration for those prepared to go the whole hog
>>> and say that The Moon is faked.
>>>
>>> FoFP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>>
>>
>