*****SPAM***** Re: Silver Machine - William Shatner

[Richard Lockwood]

It's still here:

https://myspace.com/williamshatnermusic/music/song/silver-machine-84111507-92863441

Cheers,

Rich.


On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:40 PM, mike c <insect.brain at gmail.com> wrote:

> This track was briefly slated on Spacehawks and then it vanshed.
> Not heard it yet myself.
>
> On 8/24/13, Richard Lockwood <richard.lockwood at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'll just leave this here then, shall I?
> >
> >
> https://myspace.com/williamshatnermusic/music/song/silver-machine-84111507-92863441
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Rich.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:55 PM, mary ann sullivan <
> > maryann.sullivan1 at verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> >> I hope our good Captain removed it, granted it was funny for a few
> >> seconds.
> >>
> >> Mary
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET
> ]
> >> On
> >> Behalf Of martyn white
> >> Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 4:12 AM
> >> To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET
> >> Subject: *****SPAM***** Re: Silver Machine - William Shatner
> >>
> >> Spam detection software, running on the system "www.ispnetinc.net", has
> >> identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
> >> has
> >> been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
> >> similar
> >> future email.  If you have any questions, see The administrator of that
> >> system for details.
> >>
> >> Content preview:  So, Shatner's Silver Machine has been removed from
> >> YouTube,
> >>    bummer. Who did that? Captain Kirk or Captain Brock? :) From: martyn
> >> white
> >>    To: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 11:57 PM
> >> Subject:
> >>    Re: Silver Machine - William Shatner [...]
> >>
> >> Content analysis details:   (5.9 points, 5.0 required)
> >>
> >>  pts rule name              description
> >> ---- ----------------------
> >> --------------------------------------------------
> >>  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is freemail
> >>                             (martyn_white_2003[at]yahoo.com)
> >> -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/
> ,
> >> low
> >>                             trust
> >>                             [98.136.218.70 listed in list.dnswl.org]
> >> -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD      Envelope sender domain matches handover
> relay
> >>                             domain
> >>  1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit
> >>                             (martyn white
> >> <martyn_white_2003[at]yahoo.com>
> >>                             )
> >>  2.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
> >>                             digit (martyn_white_2003[at]yahoo.com)
> >>  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
> >> -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature
> from
> >> author's
> >>                             domain
> >> -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK
> >> signature
> >>  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not
> >> necessarily valid
> >>  2.8 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO       Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain
> >> different
> >>                             freemails
> >>
> >> The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
> >> open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or
> >> confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to view it, it
> >> may
> >> be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
> >>
> >
>