[boc-l] ADMIN: Annoyance or interested?

[Christian Eric Mumford]

Thanks for concern, Ben and Ken. My Rants can be substance and sustenance. You are all ghouls watching a lone dark avenger go infinitely Insane yet keeping the thread getting more sane, The Logical Song (Supertramp). Cheers & Aloha mr. Ben Cohen, Mod'ern talking yes show concern, no one in Norway does anything but yap norwegian to me, and cus i am feeding you all my energy (like electricity from batteries) but no one feeds me back. Its time you vampires came out and said, "hey Christian, you are a great person.. here have some recharge and log off and make Plans for Nigel".

Cheers
Barbara Streisand
+ Christian 
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:01:57 -0400
From: kruch7 at cox.net
To: boc-l at lists.ispnet.net
Subject: Re: [boc-l] ADMIN: Annoyance or interested?

let him rant
http://answersfromthewizard.com/http://ariochslair.com/


On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Ben Cohen <ben at glaver.org> wrote:
Folks,



Mr. Mumford is, once again, up to his old tricks of a seemingly endless

stream-of-consciousness set of rants. As I remarked to a friend (and the owner

of the host servers), I'm not quite sure if it happens because he's started up

on drugs or he's stopped taking them.



In any event, I would like some input from the list community as a whole - are

you comfortable with / welcoming of his on-going rants or shall I, once again,

place him on moderated status (with, honestly, the expected result of my

probably not letting anything from him through).



Please note: 1) this is going to the list as a whole, so he's seeing this as

well; 2) feel free to respond either privately or publicly; 3) this truly is

an honest request for input.



There is, basically, nothing else that happens on this list, so I feel like,

on the one hand, letting him rant on isn't necessarily "bad". On the other

hand, I'm pretty sure that this wasn't what most of you were looking for.



And then, finally, on the gripping hand (look up "The Mote in God's Eye", by

Larry Niven, for explanation), there's even the question of whether the BOC-L

list should continue as a list at all. It certainly seems that, with nothing

to discuss ... it might even be time to allow it to peacefully pass into the

night.



Please - consider the discussion now open.



YnsHLM,

Ben


 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ispnet.net/pipermail/boc-l/attachments/20160425/7b636a75/attachment.html>