OFF: Bill of Rights sent to Whitehouse

[M Holmes]

Paul Mather writes:

> Mike Holmes writes:
>
> > Wouldn't it be more effective to wait until the Election and all vote
> > Libertarian? They've made it quite clear that they're utterly opposed to
> > any censorship at all, on the Net or off it.
>
> I have a recollection that in the preface to his book, _Natural Law_,
> Robert Anton Wilson claimed that there were lots of libertarians
> crying out for the book to be banned or removed from print.  I also
> understand he has been the target of libertarian censorship and angst
> over the years.

I'm somewhat gobsmacked even by the *concept* of a libertarian demanding
any sort of censorship. You definately mean "libertarian" and not
"liberal".

I'm an RAW fan of sorts, though I haven't read that book and understand
that it's different from his other writing. What's in it that's so bad
even a libertarian would cry out the dogs of censorship? It must be
something pretty amazing.
>
> Feel free to ignore this.

Inquiring minds want to know.

FoFP