BOC-L Digest - Economics blurb

[Ben F. 55017]

Whoever doesnt want the Economics posts in digestmode can unsub them
v.easily. They would only take about 20ms to load on a 56k modem anyway.
Asking people to not post OFF: topics to save a fraction of a cent is a
blatant violation of Free Speech.

If the person who requested this [banning of OFF: posts] were some sort
of Agent who's mission  is to stop people finding out the truth about
this corrupt system s/he couldnt do a better job.


Jill Strobridge wrote:

>The problem may be (looking at the header) is that they are subscribed
>to BOC-L in digest mode which doesn't separate out the different header
>types - everything is lumped together in one message no matter what the
>header content.   Consequently the digest message is likely, in some
>cases, to consist almost entirely of various economics posts!
>
>jill
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Jill Strobridge <jill at theta-orionis.freeserve.co.uk>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ben F. 55017" <vulcanfoundry at BLUEYONDER.CO.UK>
>To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>
>Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 12:26 AM
>Subject: Re: BOC-L Digest - Economics blurb
>
>
>
>
>>Then if you're bandwidth is so precious why are you subscribed for
>>
>>
>OFF: posts?
>
>
>>These are specifically for Non-Hawkwind subjects, the Doctors having
>>
>>
>this
>
>
>>discussion are operating completely within the BOC-L guidelines and
>>
>>
>very
>
>
>>interesting it is too.
>>
>>On Tuesday 08 Apr 2003 18:59, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>and those of use who are using dial-up modems, so effectively
>>>>
>>>>
>paying to
>
>
>>>>get this list PER WORD are getting hacked off with the reams of
>>>>pontification
>>>>
>>>>
>>>on
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>economics. Take it offlist please?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>OK.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>